A bond program set up three years ago may have been right for three years ago. Your business has grown. Your financials have changed. Your project pipeline looks different. Has anyone actually looked at your bond program with fresh eyes recently? Here's how to find out.
Most contractors renew their bond program the same way they renew everything else — their agent sends over paperwork, they sign it, and it rolls over for another year. It's convenient. It's familiar. And it may be costing you significantly.
Bond programs that aren't actively managed tend to drift. Your capacity may not reflect what your financials can actually support. Your rate may have room to improve. Your surety relationship may have value you're not leveraging. And the market may have changed in ways that create opportunity — if someone's looking.
Here's a practical review framework for established contractors who want to know if their current program is actually performing.
If your single project limit and aggregate limit were set more than 18 months ago and your business has grown materially since then, you may be operating under limits that no longer reflect your actual capacity. Underwriters use your financials to set limits — if your working capital and net worth have grown, your limits should too.
If you've passed on projects — or lost eligibility — because of bond limits, that's a direct revenue cost that a program review might eliminate. Many contractors don't realize they could qualify for higher limits until someone actually models it against their financials.
Your bonding program should be sized for the projects you want to win over the next 12 to 24 months — not just the ones you've historically won. If you're growing your government work pipeline, your limits need to be ahead of that growth, not behind it.
List the three largest projects you'd like to bid in the next 12 months. Can your current single project limit cover all three? If not, that's a specific gap worth addressing — and it likely has a specific financial solution.
It sounds basic, but many contractors don't know the exact rate they're paying on their bond premiums. If you don't know your rate, you can't evaluate whether it's competitive. Ask your agent for the specific premium rate as a percentage of contract amount — then compare it to market ranges.
Bond programs tend to sit with the same surety indefinitely, often because the agent has a strong relationship with that carrier and there's no urgency to shop it. But the market changes. Your financial profile changes. A contractor who was marginal three years ago may be attractive to multiple carriers today — and attractive accounts get better rates.
If you've upgraded to CPA-reviewed financials, grown your working capital, built a track record of clean completions, or improved your EMR since your last rate was negotiated, you may have earned a lower rate that no one has asked for. Rates don't automatically improve — someone has to go back to the underwriter and make the case.
The best surety relationships are ones where the underwriter knows your business, your principals, your key projects, and your growth trajectory. That familiarity translates into faster approvals, more flexibility when you need it, and an advocate on your side when something unusual comes up. If your surety relationship is purely transactional — they issue bonds and you pay — that's a relationship worth evaluating.
A single declined bond at the wrong moment can cost you a significant project. If you've experienced declines, it's worth understanding whether the issue was specific to that project, a signal about your overall program, or simply a matter of needing a different surety relationship.
Not every surety writes every size of contractor. If you're growing toward $5 million or $10 million in bond capacity, your current surety needs to be a carrier that actively writes programs at that level — and wants to grow with you. Some smaller surety operations are better suited for lower-capacity programs. Knowing the ceiling matters.
The contractors with the best-performing bond programs have a bond agent and CPA who communicate directly. The CPA knows what the surety needs to see. The bond agent knows how the financials are structured. This coordination consistently produces better outcomes — better financial presentation, fewer surprises at renewal, and a clearer roadmap for capacity growth.
If you're taking large distributions late in your fiscal year without thinking about the impact on your balance sheet, you may be inadvertently reducing your working capital at exactly the moment it gets captured for underwriting. A simple conversation between your CPA and bond agent can prevent this.
An outdated or incorrectly structured WIP schedule can slow down bond approvals and create uncertainty with underwriters. If you're not maintaining your WIP monthly and reviewing it with your CPA, that's worth fixing before your next program review.
A comprehensive bond program review with GA Risk Advisors typically involves:
There's no cost for this review. And in our experience, contractors who haven't had a formal review in more than two years almost always find something worth improving.
Your bond program is either a strategic asset that grows with your business or it's a static compliance item that costs you money and limits your opportunities. The difference between those two outcomes isn't luck — it's whether someone is actively managing the program. That's exactly what we do.
Our team works exclusively with Georgia contractors. We'll review your current program and show you exactly where the opportunity is.
Request a Free Assessment