The contracts between you and your subcontractors are risk transfer documents. Every clause either pushes liability toward them or lets it flow back to you. Most contractors sign them without fully understanding which direction the risk is moving.
When a subcontractor's employee gets injured on your jobsite, or when a sub's faulty work causes property damage, the question of who pays isn't just answered by insurance policies — it's answered by the contracts you signed. Contractors who have proper risk transfer agreements in place with every sub shift that liability where it belongs. Those who don't often find themselves defending claims for work they didn't perform, paying deductibles for incidents they didn't cause, and watching their insurance costs rise as a result.
This is one of the most impactful risk management moves a contractor can make — and one of the most commonly neglected.
An indemnification clause requires the subcontractor to defend you and pay any damages arising from their work. A hold harmless agreement is closely related — it's an agreement by one party not to hold the other liable for certain claims. In most subcontracts, these two provisions work together.
There are three basic structures, and which one you use matters significantly:
| Type | What It Means | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Broad Form | Sub indemnifies GC even for the GC's own negligence | Maximum GC protection — but many states limit enforcement |
| Intermediate Form | Sub indemnifies GC except for GC's sole negligence | Most common — balanced and widely enforceable |
| Limited Form | Sub only indemnifies for sub's own negligence | Least protective for the GC — avoid if possible |
Georgia law places limits on indemnification clauses in construction contracts. Specifically, Georgia prohibits provisions that require a party to indemnify another for the indemnitee's own negligence in certain contexts. This means broad form indemnification has enforceability limitations in Georgia — intermediate form is typically the strongest you can reliably enforce. Your contracts should be reviewed by a construction attorney familiar with Georgia law.
Requiring your subcontractors to name you as an Additional Insured on their general liability policy is the mechanism that makes the risk transfer real. As an Additional Insured, you're covered under their policy for claims arising from their work — meaning their insurance responds first before yours is touched.
The specifics matter enormously here. There are two types of Additional Insured status you should require:
Requiring both is standard practice for well-protected GCs. Many contractors only get ongoing operations coverage and leave themselves exposed to completed operations claims, which are often the most serious and expensive.
Simply getting a Certificate of Insurance from your sub is not the same as being named as an Additional Insured. The certificate is evidence of coverage — but Additional Insured status requires an endorsement on the sub's policy. Always verify the actual endorsement, not just the certificate. An endorsement that says "as required by contract" is also insufficient — you need a specific endorsement naming you.
Subrogation is the right of an insurance company to pursue a third party that caused an insurance loss. Here's why it matters to you: if your sub causes damage and their carrier pays the claim, that carrier may then try to recover their payment from you — particularly if you had any supervisory role in the work. A waiver of subrogation prevents this.
A Waiver of Subrogation endorsement on your sub's policy means their carrier waives the right to come after you even if you contributed to the loss. This should be required in every subcontract you execute, for both general liability and workers' compensation policies.
Every subcontract agreement you use should include the following insurance and risk transfer requirements:
When you're named as an Additional Insured on a sub's policy, the coverage is sometimes set up to share liability proportionally with your own policy. "Primary and Non-Contributory" language changes this — it means the sub's policy responds first and pays in full before your policy contributes anything. This is critical language that should be in both your subcontract and reflected in the Additional Insured endorsement.
Without primary and non-contributory, a claim from a sub's work could trigger your deductible, affect your claims history, and ultimately move your premium — for an incident that had nothing to do with you.
Collecting certificates of insurance is not enough. Policies expire. Subs let coverage lapse mid-project. Without a system to track expiration dates and re-verify coverage before it lapses, you can find yourself months into a project with an uninsured sub who has been working for you for weeks.
A basic COI tracking system should:
This doesn't require expensive software. A spreadsheet with automated reminders handles it for most contractors. The discipline to enforce it — not allowing a sub on your site without current, verified coverage — is what actually protects you.
Consider a common scenario: your drywall sub's worker falls from a ladder on your project. The sub's workers' comp has lapsed. The injured worker files a claim against you. Because your sub agreement doesn't have proper indemnification and the sub has no coverage, the claim runs entirely through your policy. Your deductible is hit. Your claims history is affected. Your EMR starts moving up. Two years later, you're paying more for workers comp and your bond rate has increased — for an incident caused entirely by someone else's employee.
Proper risk transfer agreements — enforced with a real COI tracking system — would have prevented every part of that scenario.
Surety underwriters and insurance carriers both review your risk management practices as part of their assessment of your business. Contractors with documented subcontract agreements, active COI programs, and clear risk transfer protocols are viewed as materially better risks. That perception translates into better rates, higher bonding capacity, and more flexibility when unusual situations arise.
At GA Risk Advisors, we review subcontractor risk transfer as part of every contractor risk assessment. We'll evaluate your current agreements, identify gaps in your COI process, and help you build a system that actually protects you — not just one that looks like it does.
Our team works exclusively with Georgia contractors. We'll review your current program and show you exactly where the opportunity is.
Request a Free Assessment